A recent House of Lords short debate has spotlighted the growing and avoidable toll of accidental injury in the UK, calling for a joined-up, government-led National Accident Prevention Strategy. The debate revealed significant cross-party concern over the 21,000 preventable accidental deaths occurring each year, with associated economic costs estimated at £12 billion annually – equally split between NHS treatment costs and lost productivity.
Peers highlighted the fragmented nature of accident prevention across government departments – Health, Transport, Education, and Levelling Up – and called for a more coordinated, data-led approach to reduce avoidable harm. There was consensus that:
Peers cited the Australian model, where a National Injury Surveillance Unit collects and publishes standardised, high-quality data to support public health and safety policy. This was viewed as a potential template for UK reform.
The debate heavily referenced recommendations from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), including:
The government, represented by Baroness Sherlock, acknowledged the need for cross-departmental working and highlighted ongoing initiatives, such as the Health and Safety Executive’s strategy, road safety campaigns (e.g. THINK!), and explorations of how AI could enhance risk mapping.
Accidents – particularly those resulting in life-changing injuries – have a profound human cost for individuals, families, and communities. A coordinated national strategy to reduce preventable harm would be widely welcomed, not just for its potential to improve public health and safety, but also for the broader societal and economic benefits that would follow.
Serious accidents often lead to complex, long-term consequences – for those affected and for the systems that support them. As part of this, the cost of compensating for severe injury inevitably contributes to the rising costs of insurance premiums across the market. While financial considerations should never be the driver, reducing the number and severity of accidents would in turn help ease some of this pressure, benefitting all those who purchase insurance.
The reference to Australia is particularly instructive: with a centralised data-led approach, Australia has demonstrated how better visibility of injury trends can lead to more targeted regulation, enhanced public education, and better resource allocation – all outcomes that UK insurers and businesses would welcome.
We will continue to monitor developments in this area and engage with relevant stakeholders. If you would like to discuss this topic in more detail, please contact Natalie Larnder.
The service you deliver is integral to the success of your business. With the right technology, we can help you to heighten your customer experience, improve underwriting performance, and streamline processes.
